The well-dressed marketing group just learned that a circuit you designed has undetectable faults. They are debating the consequences of having undetectable faults in a circuit.
The marketing people who wear Armani claim: Because an undetectable fault cannot be detected, it means that there might be something wrong in the circuit that won't be caught until the customer uses the circuit. Therefore the fault is a risk and your circuit should be changed to remove the fault.
The marketing people who wear Gucci claim: Because an undetectable fault cannot be detected, it cannot affect the behaviour of the circuit. Therefore the fault is harmless and your circuit should not be changed.
For each group (Armani and Gucci), explain what parts of their claim are correct and what parts are wrong.
The marketing people who wear Armani claim: Because an undetectable fault cannot be detected, it means that there might be something wrong in the circuit that won't be caught until the customer uses the circuit. Therefore the fault is a risk and your circuit should be changed to remove the fault.
The marketing people who wear Gucci claim: Because an undetectable fault cannot be detected, it cannot affect the behaviour of the circuit. Therefore the fault is harmless and your circuit should not be changed.
For each group (Armani and Gucci), explain what parts of their claim are correct and what parts are wrong.
Your comments will be moderated before it can appear here. Win prizes for being an engaged reader.