In the automotive industry, few connectivity technologies have achieved the level of adoption and trust that Maxim’s (now Analog Devices’) GMSL 2 and 3 have earned. With over 1.1 billion links shipped, GMSL 2/3 has become the de facto high-speed backbone for cameras, displays, and sensors across modern vehicles.

Now, ADI is taking a bold step: opening that very standard. 

The initiative, called OpenGMSL, seeks to transform GMSL from a proprietary interface into a fully documented, multi-vendor, and forward-compatible open ecosystem.

The question is not whether OpenGMSL can replace GMSL 2/3 — it includes them. The real question is whether it can evolve the technology and sustain its dominance in a rapidly shifting automotive SerDes landscape.

From Proprietary to Open: The Rationale

Automotive OEMs prize proven, validated, and robust technologies. GMSL 3 and 2 earned their place by meeting stringent automotive EMC and reliability standards and by delivering predictable performance across diverse link lengths and environmental conditions.

Yet, this success created its own limitation: vendor dependency. With ADI as the sole source for GMSL-compliant silicon, cost, supply, and innovation cycles became tied to one roadmap.

OpenGMSL is ADI’s strategic response — a move toward collaboration and openness, not competition. It aims to:

• Publish GMSL 2/3 specifications under an open framework.
• Enable interoperability across multiple silicon vendors.
• Encourage innovation through standardized extensions (higher bandwidth, better EMC, lower power).
• Preserve backward compatibility with existing GMSL 2/3 systems.

This is less about “disruption” and more about evolution through openness.

Technical Landscape: What Changes with OpenGMSL

While GMSL 3 already supports impressive data rates and robust EMC compliance, OpenGMSL expands the field in several ways:

Technically, OpenGMSL doesn’t overhaul the GMSL architecture. Instead, it introduces standardized compliance layers, open PHY specifications, and a transparent certification process. This opens the door for second-source silicon suppliers, while OEMs retain backward compatibility with legacy GMSL links.

Challenges Ahead

1. Ecosystem Inertia

GMSL 3/2 is deeply entrenched across camera modules, ECUs, and SoCs. OEMs may hesitate to re-qualify links or invest in new validation workflows unless clear cost or sourcing benefits are demonstrated.

2. Multi-Vendor Coordination

An “open” standard must deliver real interoperability — meaning shared compliance tests, certification, and version control. If second-source vendors interpret specifications differently, interoperability risks could outweigh the benefits of openness.

3. Technical Parity

OpenGMSL must maintain — or exceed — the performance envelope of GMSL 3. Maintaining low jitter, deterministic latency, and EMC margins under open implementations will require rigorous coordination and testing.

4. Governance and Trust

For OEMs to embrace OpenGMSL, governance must be genuinely collaborative — not a de facto ADI-controlled process. A neutral standards body or open consortium model would build credibility.

Opportunities: Building a Sustainable Ecosystem

• Reduced Supply-Chain Risk: Multi-vendor sourcing mitigates the risk of shortages or price swings.
• Lower Cost of Innovation: Standardized interfaces accelerate integration of sensors and displays from diverse suppliers.
• Interoperability: Simplifies design reuse across platforms and generations.
• Future-proofing: Open extension frameworks allow scaling to higher speeds and new protocols without breaking legacy links.

OpenGMSL could thus evolve into the “Linux of automotive SerDes” — a stable, extensible, community-maintained backbone that grows with the industry.

What Adopters Should Evaluate

1. Compliance & Certification: How mature are the open compliance test suites? Who governs updates?
2. Performance Consistency: Do early multi-vendor prototypes maintain the same EMC and BER performance as legacy GMSL 3 links?
3. Backward Compatibility: Can existing GMSL-based modules integrate seamlessly via OpenGMSL bridges?
4. Cost & Licensing: Are there real BOM or NRE savings from open participation?
5. Longevity: What’s the roadmap for 10-Gbps-class extensions, and who commits to long-term support?

Strategies for OpenGMSL to Succeed

• Establish Transparent Governance: Form an open consortium — similar to MIPI or ASA — to manage revisions, compliance, and IP policy.
• Preserve Backward Compatibility: OEMs should migrate seamlessly from GMSL 3 to OpenGMSL-certified designs without hardware redesign.
• Enable Multi-Vendor Certification: Define compliance suites early and certify multiple PHY vendors to avoid perception of single-vendor control.
• Demonstrate Performance Differentiation: Benchmark open implementations under real-world EMC and latency tests to prove parity with proprietary GMSL 3.
• Build an Ecosystem Narrative: Publish reference designs, open evaluation boards, and automotive-grade test reports to attract Tier-1 interest.

Outlook: Evolving, Not Competing

OpenGMSL’s biggest advantage is also its biggest challenge — it carries the legacy of its own success. By extending rather than replacing GMSL 2/3, it leverages proven reliability while promising openness, flexibility, and vendor diversity.

If ADI can demonstrate genuine multi-vendor engagement, transparent governance, and equal or better performance by 2027, OpenGMSL could transition from a proprietary SerDes link to an industry foundation for open automotive connectivity.

Otherwise, it risks being remembered not as a revolution, but as an ambitious self-reflection — a legacy made visible.

---

Author: Murugavel — Exploring semiconductor innovation, open standards, and the future of automotive electronics.